Difference between revisions of "Talk:Blocks"

From King Arthur's Gold Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with ""Knights and archers can only destroy some types of blocks but do not get the resources" - this is a lie to some point...fix it please.")
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
"Knights and archers can only destroy some types of blocks but do not get the resources" - this is a lie to some point...fix it please.
 
"Knights and archers can only destroy some types of blocks but do not get the resources" - this is a lie to some point...fix it please.
 +
* Tried to fix it. One exception for example: Knights don't get wood from destroying tree-blocks. But they get rock from rock-blocks.--[[User:Illu|Illu]] 02:16, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
 +
The information of "hits to break" seems to be outdated. I've been doing some additional research to find out how long it takes for each class to destroy a block. Recording the screen at 30 FPS the intervals between hits are:
 +
Builder: 0,46s for "soft" materials and 0,93s for "hard" ones.
 +
Knight: 0,73s for "soft" and 1,00s for "hard". 
 +
Archer: 0,66s for trees and 1,00s for dirt. 
 +
Hard materials being doors, stone and thick rock. Soft materials, all the other.
 +
Then the time for each block is this: [http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/7614/blocksy.jpg]
 +
Shall we add this info?
 +
--[[User:Drok|Drok]] 20:30, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
Doing a lot of editing here right now, I changed the names a little, for example gold nugget instead of gold rock, sorry but gold rock is not a thing... Also changing rock item to stone, gold item to gold, etc... this whole "item" deal is again pretty bad form. I also made all the blocktypes alphabetical and added all the missing ones, with pictures etc. The Navigation bars on several pages (still on it) are also from me, I tried to mimic them from what we got at the main menu.
 +
Me and my buddy also revamped the "wikitableshiney" to be more in line with the main style.
 +
About what Drok wrote is this still accurate? If so I would like to integrate it.
 +
--[[User:Wyeth|Wyeth]] 21:22, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
I removed out-of-date status, because data in table is fetched (cross-linked) from main articles about particular blocks e.g. [[Bedrock]]. This means that those articles should be flagged, not this page. --[[User:Labla|Labla]] 11:23, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:23, 19 November 2011

"Knights and archers can only destroy some types of blocks but do not get the resources" - this is a lie to some point...fix it please.

  • Tried to fix it. One exception for example: Knights don't get wood from destroying tree-blocks. But they get rock from rock-blocks.--Illu 02:16, 6 July 2011 (UTC)


The information of "hits to break" seems to be outdated. I've been doing some additional research to find out how long it takes for each class to destroy a block. Recording the screen at 30 FPS the intervals between hits are: Builder: 0,46s for "soft" materials and 0,93s for "hard" ones. Knight: 0,73s for "soft" and 1,00s for "hard". Archer: 0,66s for trees and 1,00s for dirt. Hard materials being doors, stone and thick rock. Soft materials, all the other. Then the time for each block is this: [1] Shall we add this info? --Drok 20:30, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Doing a lot of editing here right now, I changed the names a little, for example gold nugget instead of gold rock, sorry but gold rock is not a thing... Also changing rock item to stone, gold item to gold, etc... this whole "item" deal is again pretty bad form. I also made all the blocktypes alphabetical and added all the missing ones, with pictures etc. The Navigation bars on several pages (still on it) are also from me, I tried to mimic them from what we got at the main menu. Me and my buddy also revamped the "wikitableshiney" to be more in line with the main style. About what Drok wrote is this still accurate? If so I would like to integrate it. --Wyeth 21:22, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

I removed out-of-date status, because data in table is fetched (cross-linked) from main articles about particular blocks e.g. Bedrock. This means that those articles should be flagged, not this page. --Labla 11:23, 19 November 2011 (UTC)