Difference between revisions of "Talk:Classes"
From King Arthur's Gold Wiki
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* What about puting all the datas from each class to their dedicated page and then make an include of these pages in this one, instead of splitting informations in two different articles !? --[[User:Dernok|Dernok]] 07:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC) | * What about puting all the datas from each class to their dedicated page and then make an include of these pages in this one, instead of splitting informations in two different articles !? --[[User:Dernok|Dernok]] 07:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
** You are right. I've got no time to make major edits atm so I would suggest you just give it a try. :) --[[User:Illu|Illu]] 20:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC) | ** You are right. I've got no time to make major edits atm so I would suggest you just give it a try. :) --[[User:Illu|Illu]] 20:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
| − | **<s>if somebody points me in the right direction, i'll learn how and make it myself i was actually wondering if it was possible </s> already done, see if you like it, if you don't change it, otherwise let me know so i can translate it without needing to modify everything again. --[[User:JacKD|JacKD]] 22:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC) | + | **<s>if somebody points me in the right direction, i'll learn how and make it myself i was actually wondering if it was possible </s> already done, see if you like it, if you don't change it, otherwise let me know so i can translate it without needing to modify everything again. PD: i forgot to mention that i used the < onlyinclude > tag because i think that in the future we could have more specific info for each class in its own entry rather than cluttering the classes entry --[[User:JacKD|JacKD]] 22:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:51, 29 June 2011
- What about puting all the datas from each class to their dedicated page and then make an include of these pages in this one, instead of splitting informations in two different articles !? --Dernok 07:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- You are right. I've got no time to make major edits atm so I would suggest you just give it a try. :) --Illu 20:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
if somebody points me in the right direction, i'll learn how and make it myself i was actually wondering if it was possiblealready done, see if you like it, if you don't change it, otherwise let me know so i can translate it without needing to modify everything again. PD: i forgot to mention that i used the < onlyinclude > tag because i think that in the future we could have more specific info for each class in its own entry rather than cluttering the classes entry --JacKD 22:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
